Mail Bag
All in all, I am shocked at the serious deficiency in writing skills for people who are expressing themselves through writing. Truly a failure of the educational system.
----------------
1/31 - From: "Nym"
who gave you the right to bitch about my blog?
--
http://fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.
----------------
2/1 - From: "Raven"
Hello.
Thank you for linking to my diary and site on your website, I really appreciate it. I bet a lot of people read your well designed (sic) and well written (sic) journal, it must be the most interesting useless thing I've seen so far on the web. Maybe you will end up being a full time writer just like me one day. [I hope I'm never just like you! The petulance and faux-gloom would drive me nuts. - H.] Honestly: your journal says more about yourself than it says about the sites you link to (sic).
From: Kristina
at http://www.ravenheart.net
http://ravenheart.diaryland.com
----------------
2/1 - From: "Caridad Jorge"
Hey,
Hope ya know , (sic) that if you don't have anything better to do than write hateful notes about people who are creative than you should really get some hobbies.
The girl who created that journal is very talented and has alot (sic) of vision, she didn't publish it to get hateful notes everyone has there own style (sic). I wouldn't write you a nasty note just because I didn't aproove (sic) of your layout.
I just thought I'd let you know.
----------------
2/2 - From: "Caridad Jorge" (reply to Hatefuel)
You really are a pain in the ass, but I like your sarcasim (sic), it show you have character. :D
~Cary
----------------
From: reaction@altern.org
As you maybe guessed, this is a comment about your website.
There's something pretty disturbing about it. Disturbing, but leaving one overally (sic) indifferent (sic).
See, you give so much spite and hate at trying to demolish people's diary (sic), but wich (sic) such superficial and vain arguments that in the end, your quest leads nowhere (sic). You attack them on very subjective designing criterias (sic), and qualify (sic) them of things that leaves to think that the author of those critics is more about uselessly insulting ramdo (sic), people than actually making a thorough examination of their online creations (sic). You're hateful, indeed, and your pun on "hatefuel" reflects more your inability to spell correctly than any kind of wit.
Because you're not without knowing you spell the easiest language on earth like a second grader.
But then, maybe you'd like to feel how it is to receive such criticism? [One must be able to take what one dishes, no? My criticism of your email: You write like an ESL student on paint fumes. - H.] Well here are my thoughts about your "productions" (sic), if they deserve that word. Not that I have the pretention to think they may be of any
importances (sic) to you [Oh, but you do, otherwise, you wouldn't write them! - H.], but only by justice (sic), so you're being done what youre (sic) doing to others, in polite terms and with class [Those who proclaim to have class do not. -H.], because I'm above basic hatred.
Your design is lame, featurless, and its supposed simplicity is just insipid.
You can't spell.
Your concept has absolutely no originality, even your ideas and expressions are incredibly common, but in your case, it's particularly poor and shallow.
Your aim seems inexistent.
Well, thank you for having had the attention to read until there (sic).
Please notice that I won't take the time to reply to any injurious things you might send back. I'm too old to take any interest in a stupid interest flame war. [Funny position to take for someone who did exactly that. -H] The above words were merely a [maybe crude] (sic) observation.
-L
----------------
Ah, well. I'll keep fighting, and someday will win this war on terrible-to-look-at and impossible-to-read websites!
All in all, I am shocked at the serious deficiency in writing skills for people who are expressing themselves through writing. Truly a failure of the educational system.
1/31 - From: "Nym"
who gave you the right to bitch about my blog?
--
http://fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.
2/1 - From: "Raven"
Hello.
Thank you for linking to my diary and site on your website, I really appreciate it. I bet a lot of people read your well designed (sic) and well written (sic) journal, it must be the most interesting useless thing I've seen so far on the web. Maybe you will end up being a full time writer just like me one day. [I hope I'm never just like you! The petulance and faux-gloom would drive me nuts. - H.] Honestly: your journal says more about yourself than it says about the sites you link to (sic).
From: Kristina
at http://www.ravenheart.net
http://ravenheart.diaryland.com
2/1 - From: "Caridad Jorge"
Hey,
Hope ya know , (sic) that if you don't have anything better to do than write hateful notes about people who are creative than you should really get some hobbies.
The girl who created that journal is very talented and has alot (sic) of vision, she didn't publish it to get hateful notes everyone has there own style (sic). I wouldn't write you a nasty note just because I didn't aproove (sic) of your layout.
I just thought I'd let you know.
2/2 - From: "Caridad Jorge" (reply to Hatefuel)
You really are a pain in the ass, but I like your sarcasim (sic), it show you have character. :D
~Cary
From: reaction@altern.org
As you maybe guessed, this is a comment about your website.
There's something pretty disturbing about it. Disturbing, but leaving one overally (sic) indifferent (sic).
See, you give so much spite and hate at trying to demolish people's diary (sic), but wich (sic) such superficial and vain arguments that in the end, your quest leads nowhere (sic). You attack them on very subjective designing criterias (sic), and qualify (sic) them of things that leaves to think that the author of those critics is more about uselessly insulting ramdo (sic), people than actually making a thorough examination of their online creations (sic). You're hateful, indeed, and your pun on "hatefuel" reflects more your inability to spell correctly than any kind of wit.
Because you're not without knowing you spell the easiest language on earth like a second grader.
But then, maybe you'd like to feel how it is to receive such criticism? [One must be able to take what one dishes, no? My criticism of your email: You write like an ESL student on paint fumes. - H.] Well here are my thoughts about your "productions" (sic), if they deserve that word. Not that I have the pretention to think they may be of any
importances (sic) to you [Oh, but you do, otherwise, you wouldn't write them! - H.], but only by justice (sic), so you're being done what youre (sic) doing to others, in polite terms and with class [Those who proclaim to have class do not. -H.], because I'm above basic hatred.
Your design is lame, featurless, and its supposed simplicity is just insipid.
You can't spell.
Your concept has absolutely no originality, even your ideas and expressions are incredibly common, but in your case, it's particularly poor and shallow.
Your aim seems inexistent.
Well, thank you for having had the attention to read until there (sic).
Please notice that I won't take the time to reply to any injurious things you might send back. I'm too old to take any interest in a stupid interest flame war. [Funny position to take for someone who did exactly that. -H] The above words were merely a [maybe crude] (sic) observation.
-L
Ah, well. I'll keep fighting, and someday will win this war on terrible-to-look-at and impossible-to-read websites!
posted by Unknown at
7:23 PM
